<data:blog.pageName/> | <data:blog.title/> <data:blog.pageTitle/> var titletext=" Gisela Bianca's Diaries"; // TITLEBAR TEXT var repeat=true; // SET TO true TO REPEAT, false TO "TYPE" OUT TITLE ONLY ONCE. var index=0; function scrolltitle(){ if(index<=titletext.length){ document.title=titletext.substring(0, index); index++; setTimeout('scrolltitle()', 200); }else{ index=0; if(repeat)setTimeout('scrolltitle()', 1000); }} window.onload=function(){ if(!document.layers)setTimeout('scrolltitle()', 1000); }
Hello! No Ripping !
Tuesday, March 24, 2015 '
DIPLOMACY
Diplomacy from Time to Time

When you go to International Relations Major, the first job you think undoubtedly is to be a diplomat. Diplomacy thing has been started since the Greek civilization in their heyday until these days. In the first chapter of this book, Lauren wants to tell us about how diplomacy evolves. Furthermore, he told us about 3 systems of diplomacy in the next chapter. They are the diplomacy which is done by balancing their power. Then, make defensive alliances and the last making bipolar alignment.
It was all started when city-states in Greek begin multiplied fast and granted conflicts between them. Seeing that, Thucydides revealed that this war will never end as long as the weak one never have chance to fight back. So, he provoked an idea that which was better, to fight alone or make a company. Consequently, they would settle the conflict in a peace way. As a result, they come up with an idea that every city-state has a representative who is sent to other city-state to make an agreement of cooperation. This diplomatic way started to proliferate until Rome. But, different from the Greeks, Rome wanted to have a bigger role. For that reason, they made an organization to gather the other states. According to this book, Rome made his own rules about the war and peace which have to be obeyed by the states that joint this organization.
As time passed, people evolved so do the military grew stronger. One by one of these city-states started to feel insecure for fear that other city-state will attack them.  In order to overcome the worry, Italian city-states not just sent their representative if there was a conflict but they want to their delegate to settle down in other city-states to kept an eye on them. Many of people criticized what actually these diplomats do, but the important is they have to give their home city-states an exact, detail and specific report about the city-states where they live.
Go forward to seventeenth century when the modern states started to emerge. States that succeed get through the war even it end after the time that has been defined became the Great Powers. They are Britain, France, Austria, Prussia and Russia. How they could success is because of these 3 characteristics that are revealed by this book. They are: Effective armed forces; an able bureaucracy and a theory of state (pp.8). The idea of raison d’état said that the states go to war not only because their leader want to do so but they wage war if they need not because they want it. For instance, Cardinal Richelieu that implemented this idea and successfully made France to be one of the Great Powers in that time. Unfortunately, this idea made statesmen just think about how to win the war and how their political interest to be accomplished. In effect, they didn’t looked down to the citizen that lost their human rights. Thus, it leaded that war only can be waged under the agreement people within states. They began to centralize their power to minimize the friction within their states. Lauren said in this book that, the best states at that time is France who could use their resources effectively and efficiently and do the centralization to maximize their power. France’s power increased day by day and started trying to dominate others. Seeing that, the other states started seeking ally with other states to do the balancing and this was becoming the pioneer of diplomacy in seventeenth century.  
Ironic, the best word to describe what was happened in the eighteenth century. The appearance of Immanuel Kant who yelled out the human rights and democracy make a contrary which is this century also known as the most violent era. Whereby every states wanted to occupy others to expand their territory (pp.13). This tragedy made they realized that they should have not war among others and made their citizens suffered. Hence, they start to consider that they should have tried to not be greedy. As in the book is written that, “They consider the possibility that their own national self-interest might be well served by considering their collective interests as a whole (pp. 22). “
Continuing the idea that they should walk together is in the next chapter. Lauren writes 3 different diplomatic systems that were used in eighteenth century. First of all, the leaders of Great Powers agreed that they should be oriented in peace. In order to maintain a peaceful world, they had a meeting in Vienna to distribute their power. This system emphasizes in the allocation of the territory and has a sanction for those who break the agreement. Henry Kissinger told us that this deal didn’t satisfy any states for the purpose of a stable condition. He said that, “if there was a state that satisfy then the others would felt dissatisfy and it will lead to an occurrence of jealousy among the states (pp. 26).” Except that, they also need people who have responsibility in dealing with the systems and willingness to maintain and defend it (pp.28).
Luckily, this system has succeed in postpone the occurrence of war. Solving the conflict with diplomatic ways and also prevent the situation which can trigger a conflict. These are what they have done in order to restrain a war, such as: minimize friction, avoid misperception and miscalculations, made clear distinctions between legitimate and illegitimate ends and means in the pursuit of policy (pp. 29). Even though the ideologies between those states are different, they still could cooperate under the same collective interest. Regrettably, some of statesmen are unsuitable with this condition therefore made other governments feel insecure and could spark a violence.    
As time goes by everything has changed. One by one of the states started to broke their agreement in Vienna meeting. War began again as a result of the insecurity of the statesmen not because a thread that is really existed. They asked for a renewal of the distribution of the territory seeing that emerge unfairness between the allocations of it. Besides, economic factor also play a role in that time such as tariff wars and colonial competition (pp. 33). Consequently, Bismarck argued that every state needs great military. This defensive system became the second system that Lauren wants to tell us about. To restrain the thread that comes from other states, a state should have a strong army and have defensive allies. In this case, to maintain Germany power so he couldn’t dominate others (pp. 34).
But, Germany didn’t stay still. He encouraged other country to join him in attacking and occupying other states. Britain who never joined this agreement couldn’t do anything while France chose to stay isolated. The aggressiveness of German made tighten the tension. To prevent the same mistakes like France did in the other time, a new system emerged. They made a bipolar alignment which is consisted of two different alliances: The Triple Alliances (Germany, Austria, and Italy) and the Triple Entente (Britain, France and Russia) (pp. 38). From the two formerly system, this third system also include the Balance of Power and collective interest of the Great Powers. But, it is more secret between two big alliances and more unstable and inflexible (pp.38).
To sum up, diplomacy has been believed to be used as the only way to avoid war. Peace is a dream of all people especially the citizen who always suffered if there was a war. The main actor of these three systems is Great Powers of Europe. They are the central of all the decision are taken. Diplomacy is used to restrain a state who tried to be a hegemonic state. How? They made a win-win solution between states. No one has full satisfaction of their needy so they have same feeling and no one feel being intimidated by others. Everyone realize that no one could stop war, the only way we could do is to make a limitation to wage a war and war is only legitimate for a political objectives. War also could be legal if there is a state who wants to dominate. Nevertheless, this system won’t work if there aren’t people who execute this. Trained diplomats, big responsibility and willingness to protect this system based on the advice of de Callières (pp. 43). Finally, if we can afford a peace world why war should be waged?

 Bibliography    :       

Lauren, P. G., Craig, G. A., & George, A. L. (2007). The Emergence of Diplomacy and the Great Powers. In FORCE and STATECRAFT (pp. 3-13). New York: Oxford University Press.

Lauren, P. G., Craig, G. A., & George, A. L. (2007). The Classical System of Diplomacy, 1815-1914. In FORCE and STATECRAFT (pp. 24-40). New York: Oxford University Press.







Me

Gisela Bianca
I LOVE to be ME
a Saggitarius Girl
International Relations student ;
was 'OSIS 08' Marie Joseph JHS ;
was VLODZ announcer ;
was BVOICE announcer ;
Belieber since July 2009
YOLO


Cravings
Last update:

Beloved
Click Here to See

♥♥

Sorry if i miss out you; tag me


Confession here !


Special Thanks To :
KaCaangs !
Vita Chandra
Michael Adam
Agnes Trismuria
Cynthia
Vanessa Jacobus